|
Communique — Documents — Home
This page contains links to external Web sites. The Treatment Improvement Exchange has no control over their content or availability.
The Ohio Cost-Effectiveness Study
The conclusions of Ohio's 4-year
study on the cost-effectiveness of substance abuse treatment confirm what
addiction services professionals have known from experience all along. Drug
treatment works, improves people's lives, and saves money. And for people on
welfare with substance abuse problemsan estimated 20 to 30 percent of
welfare heads of householdthe study holds
out even more promise. People who engage in substance abuse treatment show
a substantial increase in their ability to get and keep a job, a crucial consideration
in the era of welfare
reform.
Conducted by CATOR/New Standards for the Ohio Department of Alcohol
and Drug Addiction Services (ODADAS), the study analyzed abstinence/relapse
patterns, job problems, criminal justice involvement, health care utilization,
and social and family relationships. The information came from the clients
themselves.
People who were admitted for substance abuse treatment filled out
comprehensive questionnaires covering their alcohol and drug use, their health, their
legal issues, and their employment histories. Researchers contacted these clients
6 months after intake, and again 1 year after intake. The results, according
to ODADAS Director Luceille Fleming, "are
astounding." Among those who completed treatment, Fleming said,
"absenteeism was reduced by 61 percent, incomplete work by 37 percent,
and mistakes in work by 36 percent. Real numbers, real people, real benefits to
the employer, to the employee, and to Ohio
taxpayers."
The economic impact of substance abuse treatment completion was
overwhelmingly positive for improved job performance and diminished
involvement with the criminal justice system. The Ohio Cost-Effectiveness Study
also showed sizable cost offsets for all
treatment types and levels of client severity. Detoxification plus treatment
services resulted in a higher level of abstinence for all clients than detoxification alone.
And clients who received intensive
levels of service and continuing care achieved a higher level of
abstinence than those who did not.
Fleming attributes these outcomes to "early detection and close
collaborative intervention by County Human
Services Departments and the County Alcohol, Drug Addiction and Mental Health
Services Boards. Their shared goal is to reduce addiction as an impediment
to employment through appropriate referral and monitored
treatment," she said.
"Ohio is proud of its study because it was done by an outside entity
and ODADAS had no control over which programs were chosen for the survey.
It is large enough to make us confident of the results," Fleming said.
The study results demonstrate that "the success of welfare reform will
depend significantly upon the availability
and utilization of appropriate treatment for addiction-related problems," she added.
"It is critical that this opportunity not be wasted."
CSAT, the Treatment Improvement Exchange, and the editors of
the TIE Communiqué thank Luceille Fleming, Director, Ohio
Department of Alcohol and Drug Addiction Services, and her staff members
for their assistance in the preparation of this article. Further
information on the Ohio Cost-Effectiveness Study can be obtained from
the Ohio Department of Alcohol and Drug Addiction Services,
Two Nationwide Plaza, 280 North High St., 12th Floor, Columbus,
OH 43215-2537; telephone: 614-466-3445; TDD/TTY: 614-644-9140; fax:
614-752-8645. Current information and news releases are also
available at their Web site: http://www.state.oh.us/ada/odada.htm
Economic Impact of Substance Abuse Treatment
on Job Performance
Source: Ohio Department of Alcohol and Drug Addiction Services, 1996.
CSAT's Treatment Improvement Exchange
 
Table of
Contents
Last Updated
|